other source: http://www.fortranlib.com/FORTRAN-1982.wmv
Physics
(Higgs) boson: Update from CERN
StandardSome videos & links about the recent update regarding the (Higgs) boson:
“We know it is a new boson. But we still have to prove definitively that it is the one that Higgs predicted.”
“It’s a boson:” Higgs quest bears new particle [Reuters]
The Higgs Boson Explained from PHD Comics on Vimeo.
For more videos and comics by Jorge Cham and Daniel Whiteson, visit http://www.phdcomics.com/higgs
This video made with the support of the University of California at Irvine.
Others
Live-Blogging the Higgs Seminar
[vid] Higgs Boson announcement from Cern: as it happened
[vid] Press Conference: Update on the search for the Higgs boson at CERN on 4 July 2012
What is Computational Physics (Science)?
StandardAs a senior physics undergraduate I have come to believe that scientific computation must be part of the physics curriculum. It is true that physics students are required to study and master many topics, languages, techniques, and skills like mathematics, linguistics, & science communication, still I think that computational physics should be a major part of the curriculum. It is not logical to be in the age of supercomputers and the physics curriculum remain bound to pen and paper as it used to be before the advent of computers! I am not suggesting that physics should all be done on computers; absolutely not. The student must acquire the necessary theoretical and mathematical concepts and skills, besides the physics thinking, before delving in computational physics! What use would a computer have if its user doesn’t know what he wants to use it for? In other words, how would a physics student who hasn’t studied classical mechanics be able to solve a classical mechanics problem on a computer? He will surely not be able to do so, since he will not be able to appropriately instruct the computer due to his lack of conceptual physics and paper & pen problem solving skills. In short, “a computer is as dumb as its user is dump, and a computer is as smart as a smart user; the smarter and knowledgeable the user, the more productive and efficient the computer is”!
The computer is a little over 70 years old. The first computer, many articles & resources claim, is the “Electronic Numerical Integrator And Computer“, or ENIAC for short, which is not technically correct. Many other computers preceded ENIAC most of which were developed for military purposes (e.g; calculation of artillery, cryptoanalysis, etc…) and were analogue (or electro-mechanical) & programmed by punched cards. ENIAC was a room-sized computer that required several people to operate by turning on/off switches that made use of vacuum tubes the ancestor of the modern transistor.
One particularly interesting electromechanical machine (could be called a computer) was the “bombe” [1] which was [designed] by the mathematician Alan Turing to be used to crack the Enigma, the code used by the Nazi to encrypt messages.
|

